| | Voting on another rule |  |
|
|
| Should the loser of a close challenge be able to call upon a deciding final round? | | Yes | | 17% | [ 1 ] | | No | | 83% | [ 5 ] | | Don't Care | | 0% | [ 0 ] |
| | Total Votes : 6 | | | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
|  Subject: Voting on another rule  Tue Sep 02, 2008 12:22 am | |
|  mentioned this rule on the last poll.
Last edited by The Eye on Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:41 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:24 am | |
| No point mentioning this as most people eg. 2 seem to be against it anyway, but thought we could use the tie-break system from the official rules. When a player is reduced to 0 or less life, five extra turns are played to see if he could kill the opponent. Five turns means: Turn 1-Player A Turn 2-Player B Turn 3-Player A Turn 4-Player B Turn 5-Player A We can be flexible with the amount of turns. Take an extra turn abilities count towards one of these five turns.
Last edited by The Eye on Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:41 am; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:25 am | |
| Really, no opinions more developed than a simple 'no'? | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:40 am | |
| You've got to be kidding . | |
|
| | |
Akuri_Mitsu
Santa's favourite recipient
Posts : 1012
Join date : 2008-05-19
Age : 30
Location : AT MY HOME :D:D:D
| | Subject: wining Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:29 pm | |
| nah i think thatd be pretty stuffed
a wins a win | |
|
| | |
Zombie Hobo
Zombie Hobo
Posts : 214
Join date : 2008-05-23
Age : 29
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:56 pm | |
| thats like someone complaining coz they got a bad draw so they want a rematch | |
|
| | |
Akuri_Mitsu
Santa's favourite recipient
Posts : 1012
Join date : 2008-05-19
Age : 30
Location : AT MY HOME :D:D:D
| | Subject: nah weell Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:46 pm | |
| nah well you can just face them again anyways
and i like to challange so if i lose i get to challenge more people so | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:45 am | |
| Yes, but this is in a situation where it was just luck that broke a balanced situation | |
|
| | |
Chris
Flushing Meadows.
Posts : 1200
Join date : 2008-05-18
Location : The Valley
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:56 am | |
| I agree... what I suggested to WWW  is that if both players agree prior to a challenge, the challenge could be "best of 5", instead of "best of 3". I dont see a problem if both players agree, however the default would remain at "best of 3" This could potentially be a better indicator of the relative strengths of players' decks and reduce the impact that random chance has on the final outcome. Luck of the draw does seem to be a major factor in the outcome of some of these matches.  | |
|
| | |
Akuri_Mitsu
Santa's favourite recipient
Posts : 1012
Join date : 2008-05-19
Age : 30
Location : AT MY HOME :D:D:D
| | Subject: lucky draw Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:47 am | |
| yes buit while that is true
luck too is a basic of any card game magic or other wise
and if you are not lucky you will not win AT ALL | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:38 am | |
| But as the number of games increases, Andy, the margin should become more apparent. I think best of 5 is a fair alternative. | |
|
| | |
Rincewind
Forum Wizzard
Posts : 994
Join date : 2008-05-16
Age : 32
Location : Unseen University, Ankh-Morpork
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:32 pm | |
| Yeah, but don't be mean. Some people here don't even have 5 decks... | |
|
| | |
Akuri_Mitsu
Santa's favourite recipient
Posts : 1012
Join date : 2008-05-19
Age : 30
Location : AT MY HOME :D:D:D
| | Subject: good point Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:51 am | |
| yeah i hardly have 4 now
how would i do five!?!?! | |
|
| | |
The Eye
Maximum Madness / Foil Grabbing Maniac
Posts : 1445
Join date : 2008-05-17
Age : 30
Location : Salami Producers Catering Association
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:08 am | |
| Well, people don't need to use two other decks for extended rounds. | |
|
| | |
Chris
Flushing Meadows.
Posts : 1200
Join date : 2008-05-18
Location : The Valley
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:33 am | |
| The option to go to "best of 5" would be just that.
It would not be compulsory, it would be agreed by consensus.
Therefore there is no requirement to have 5 decks. | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Voting on another rule | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Voting on another rule | |
|
